Transparencia en la investigación biomédica: A propósito de los riesgos asociados al uso de Avandia:

Autores/as

  • Sofía Salas Directora Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales
  • Moisés Russo Docente de Bioética, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales y Asesor del Comité de Ética en Investigación Científica del Área Metropolitana Occidente

Resumen

The question of how and when to communicate potential risks associated with new drugs has remained an important focus of tension between the pharmaceutical industry and regulator entities, such as the American Food and Drug Administration. Recently, there has been widespread concern related to the cardiovascular risks associated with the use of Avandia, a rosiglitazone produced by Glaxo Smith Kline. In fact, several metaanalyses involving rosiglitazone provided a relatively consistent message that rosiglitazone increases the risk of myocardial ischemic events. In the present article, we review the controversy regarding the way the pharmaceutical company handled this issue, and we describe examples of inappropriate conduct regarding an industry-sponsored clinical trial with this drug. We raise several important ethical questions related to the way researchers handle conflict of interest when they are employees of the pharmaceutical industry. Finally, we discuss the requirements to conduct biomedical research funded by the pharmaceutical industry in Chile.

Publicado

2010-09-08

Cómo citar

Salas, S., & Russo, M. (2010). Transparencia en la investigación biomédica: A propósito de los riesgos asociados al uso de Avandia:. Revista Médica De Chile, 138(9). Recuperado a partir de https://mail.revistamedicadechile.cl/index.php/rmedica/article/view/1027

Número

Sección

Articulo Especial

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a